The Treasury has confirmed the Autumn Statement will be on 23 November.
When George Osborne was replaced as Chancellor in July 2016, his successor, Philip Hammond, deliberately avoided taking any action. He left the immediate economic response to Mark Carney and the Monetary Policy Committee at the Bank of England, which duly cut interest rates to 0.25% and announced £70bn more quantitative easing (QE) in early August.
Mr Hammond did say he would consider a “fiscal reset” in the Autumn Statement if data available by then suggested it was necessary. We already know that the new Chancellor has abandoned his predecessor’s goal of a budget surplus by 2019/20, but beyond that what form a ‘reset’ could take is unclear.
Shifting the target
The latest UK public finance figures show that government borrowing in the first five months of the year was £4.9bn below the level in 2015/16. Given that Mr Osborne’s spring Budget forecast represented a cut of £21bn from last year, it looks most unlikely his successor will reach next April on target. It is arguable that the higher than planned borrowing is effectively a “reset” in itself, leaving Mr Hammond little additional room for manoeuvre.
However, that might not prove to be the case. The “not just the privileged few” rhetoric of Theresa May has prompted some suggestions that her new Chancellor may take a different line on tax. For example, a more equal approach to pensions could be to introduce a flat rate of contribution tax relief. Depending on the rate chosen, such a move could generate additional funds for the Treasury to use in boosting the economy, for example, through spending on infrastructure and housing.
The Autumn Statement looks set to be the most important for some time and we wait with interest to see the key outcomes.